Explainer Chilean Earthquake Rocks Formerly Quiet Zone

Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Email Isn’t this a seismically active region? The subduction zone along the western edge of South America, where the Nazca plate slides eastward beneath the South American plate at an average rate of about 6.5 centimeters per year, can indeed generate massive quakes. But Tuesday’s temblor occurred along a stretch of tectonic boundary that hadn’t slipped to produce a major quake in nearly 150 years. The last large quake to strike there happened in 1877 and had a magnitude of 8.8. Since then, the region had been so quiet that scientists dubbed it “the Iquique seismic gap” and referred to it as “locked.”Despite the lack of large quakes in the gap, some researchers had suggested the region might be overdue for a large temblor. That’s because the 1877 event followed another magnitude-8.8 quake that occurred just to the north along the same tectonic boundary in 1868. The most recent quake along that section of tectonic boundary, which lies mostly off the southern coast of Peru, was a magnitude-8.4 temblor that struck in June 2001. If seismic history repeats itself, then the Iquique region was slightly overdue for a large quake like Tuesday’s.But how repeatable are such patterns of quakes?It’s difficult to say, simply because the intervals between quakes of that magnitude are so long and historical records in many regions are so short. Plus, before seismic instruments were first deployed in the early 1900s, earthquake magnitudes had to be estimated rather than measured. In areas with sparse populations, such as along the remote coast of Chile, records are particularly spotty and could be inaccurate.So, can large quakes be predicted?Not when it comes to the specific times and places of earthquakes. Quakes can be “forecast” only over large seismic areas and long time scales. In a 2006 paper in Science, researchers—including David Robinson, then a seismologist at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom—noted that the June 2001 in Peru quake ruptured only 400 km of the 1000-km-long seismic gap, leaving 600 km of the plate boundary largely locked. A quake rupturing the full length of the still-locked section might reach magnitude 9, Robinson says. Because Tuesday’s quake wasn’t nearly that strong, it suggests that a portion of the gap remains locked. But that’s not necessarily a sign that the locked-up section is ready to let loose, Robinson notes. It’s entirely possible that recently slipped areas of the plate boundary will be able to absorb any additional stress, thereby delaying a temblor in the still-locked section. For now, it’s impossible to say when Chile should expect its next major quake—though as one of the world’s most seismically active countries, it probably won’t be long.*Update, 3 April, 11:05 a.m.: On the evening of 2 April, after this story was posted, two more large quakes occurred within the Iquique seismic gap. One, a magnitude-6.5 temblor, happened just before 9:00 p.m. local time and was centered 43 kilometers west of Iquique, Chile. The other, a magnitude-7.6 event, struck about 45 minutes later and originated about 19 km south of Iquique. In the early evening of Tuesday, 1 April, a magnitude-8.2 quake occurred off the coast of northern Chile, killing six people, generating 2-meter-high waves, and prompting the evacuation of nearly 1 million coastal residents. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the temblor was centered about 95 kilometers northwest of the port city of Iquique and originated at a depth of about 20 kilometers. The location of the quake, as well as data from seismometers indicating in which direction the ground moved, suggests it occurred along the boundary between the Nazca and South American tectonic plates.Was the quake expected?Looking back, it’s not surprising. First, the region had recently experienced increased seismic activity, including a magnitude-6.7 quake 2 weeks ago and a series of aftershocks that included three with a magnitude of 6.2, 26 with a magnitude of 5 or greater, and more than 60 with a magnitude of 4 or more. During this 2-week period, seismic activity had, in general, moved northward; Tuesday evening’s magnitude-8.2 temblor was centered near the northern end of this seismic sequence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *