The digital services tax is targeting the wrong companies

first_imgMonday 21 September 2020 9:31 am (AFP via Getty Images) City A.M.’s opinion pages are a place for thought-provoking views and debate. These views are not necessarily shared by City A.M. Opinion The digital services tax (DST), which taxes the revenues of multinational companies where they make them, is likewise a good soundbite. According to the government’s website, it affects only “large multinational enterprises with revenue derived from the provision of a social media platform, a search engine, or an online marketplace (‘in scope activities’) to UK users”. Show Comments ▼ The European Commission is waiting on the outcome of this – to see whether the OECD will reach an international agreement on the taxation of the digital economy – before restarting its own moves towards a DST. More From Our Partners Police Capture Elusive Tiger Poacher After 20 Years of Pursuing the Huntergoodnewsnetwork.orgSupermodel Anne Vyalitsyna claims income drop, pushes for child supportnypost.comBrave 7-Year-old Boy Swims an Hour to Rescue His Dad and Little Sistergoodnewsnetwork.orgRussell Wilson, AOC among many voicing support for Naomi Osakacbsnews.comA ProPublica investigation has caused outrage in the U.S. this weekvaluewalk.comFlorida woman allegedly crashes children’s birthday party, rapes teennypost.comAstounding Fossil Discovery in California After Man Looks Closelygoodnewsnetwork.orgBiden received funds from top Russia lobbyist before Nord Stream 2 giveawaynypost.comNative American Tribe Gets Back Sacred Island Taken 160 Years Agogoodnewsnetwork.orgI blew off Adam Sandler 22 years ago — and it’s my biggest regretnypost.comInside Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis’ not-so-average farmhouse‘Neighbor from hell’ faces new charges after scaring off home buyersnypost.com980-foot skyscraper sways in China, prompting panic and evacuationsnypost.comWhy people are finding dryer sheets in their mailboxesnypost.comKiller drone ‘hunted down a human target’ without being told tonypost.comMatt Gaetz swindled by ‘malicious actors’ in $155K boat sale boondogglenypost.comUK teen died on school trip after teachers allegedly refused her pleasnypost.comBill Gates reportedly hoped Jeffrey Epstein would help him win a Tags: Google Google Tax Tax This paper last week revealed that Google will increase the price of advertising on its platforms in the UK due to the DST. All is fair. Google receives a cost increase, that cost is passed down the supply chain. As a publisher, we pay firms such as Google to promote our content. So that cost is passed onto us. One can not help but feel we undertook our own DST experiment in a bizarre display of our newfound independence, when it is patent that revenue taxation is a crude proxy for corporate income tax on larger companies. Indeed, reading the small print of the policy makes matters only worse. “The government is committed to dis-applying the DST once an appropriate international solution is in place”, it says. Further, “this measure is not expected to have any significant macroeconomic impacts”. Tax-avoiding American monoliths finally paying their fair share resonates with the small business owner who once paid more tax than Netflix. The misalignment between the place where tech giants’ profits are taxed, and the place where value is created, no doubt needs to be addressed as the digital economy matures. But bear in mind that cost-pass-through, and it becomes apparent that this tax is far from the right solution. So there you have it. A temporary solution that raises a negligible amount for the exchequer at the expense of small businesses. That’s not such a good soundbite, is it? The digital services tax is targeting the wrong companies whatsapp Cost-pass-through is a well-established economic theory. It describes what happens when a business changes the price of the products or services it sells following a change in the cost of producing them – be that an increase in procurement or production costs, increased demand, or a tax hike. When the government announced its ban on letting fees last year, for example, it was widely assumed that landlords and letting agents would simply pass the loss onto tenants through increases in rent. Clearly the government knew this would happen. But it’s a nice soundbite, and movers are grateful for the perceived extra £150 in their pocket. This is not the fault of Google or any other tech firm – far from it. Within a free market, it is of course a platform’s prerogative to price how it likes. But when businesses like ours are so reliant on a handful of platforms subject to the DST, we cease to operate in an economic system in which prices are determined by unrestricted competition between businesses.  (AFP via Getty Images) Also Read: The digital services tax is targeting the wrong companies But the solution is not a laissez faire free-for-all whereby these firms send their profits to the US – however much Trump may believe that. The solution, ironically, is what the tech titans themselves are arguing for: tighter global, rather than national, regulation. Our prices are determined by punitive government policy – an undemocratic market-within-a-market over which we have no say. Certainly not what one would expect from an erstwhile libertarian like Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Nat Poulter is chief operating officer at Jungle Creations Nat Poulter (AFP via Getty Images) Also Read: The digital services tax is targeting the wrong companies Share whatsapp The OECD is currently hosting negotiations with over 130 countries that aims to adapt an international tax system, whereby relevant businesses would pay some of their corporate income taxes where their consumers or users are located.  So much for “large multinational enterprises” paying their fair share. Rather than trillion dollar tech firms bearing the brunt, far smaller, innovative businesses navigating a pandemic are paying it for them. The DST hurts the wrong businesses and stifles our ability to develop and grow. But the nature of our business is that our content is free to consumers and paid for through advertising. On this basis it is virtually impossible to pass on. In essence, we are paying the DST. last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *